Our Blogs

An American billionaire’s attempts to deny his wife a substantial divorce settlement failed yesterday. His argument – he’s an ‘innate genius’. Henry Silverman, 68, from New York, claimed that he amassed his vast fortune as a result of his superior intellect and that his wife, Nancy, had not contributed to his success and attempted to submit three affidavits from psychologists in support of his argument. State Supreme Court judge Laura Drager refused to consider this evidence, however, stating that whilst there was no doubt that Henry – who earns a reported $50 million per annum – possessed great acumen and skill which could be directly attributed to the success of his business, his wife had effectively administered the couple’s domestic and social life and raised their daughter, Casey – all actions which, she claimed, aided Henry’s success. The couple’s 30 year marriage came to an end in 2008, following Henry leaving Nancy for yoga instructor Karen Hader to whom he is now engaged.